So this week I made the short trip from
Brighton to London to attend a talk on electronic music aesthetics at Stratford
Circus, hosted by hipper-than-hip music magazine The Wire. Chaired by Steve ‘Kode9’
Goodman, and a panel consisting of Simon ‘Retromania’ Reynolds, Joe
Muggs and The Wire’s own Lisa Blanning, this was certainly an exciting, informative, but ever so slightly daunting experience for me. Although I’ve
come across a small amount of lofty academic
writing on contemporary music, I don’t think I’ve ever heard Adorno and Marxist
concepts, and dizzying phrases like ‘generational polarization’
and ‘hyper-localization’, being bandied about in music discussion quite so casually before. So much
for the break from my university studies, then.
At first I felt some creeping skepticism in
relation to all of this – and I can’t help but think of how many artists would
find such a studious, intellectually-stuffy approach fairly laughable. But having almost reached the end of my undergraduate experience, I do think it would
be easy to suggest that serious study of contemporary music feels like a rather
undernourished, untapped area in academia. Whereas film, television and media
studies seem to have permeated modes of thought at most higher education
institutions, the study of modern music in any meaningful sense seems to sit on
the fringes, if at all (although Goodman's position at the University
of East London does serve as a clear exception to this). In fact
I do think that closely
scrutinizing musical trends could at times be a more effective cultural tool
for entering into discourses on sociological, aesthetic – and perhaps even
political – trends, than might immediately be achieved through film and
television studies. For instance, serious reflection on the changing face of dance
music culture over the last twenty plus years – with all it’s complex links to
taste, community and even criminality - would probably tell us far more about
the changing face of modern Britain than say, insight into the semiotics of Eastenders,
or studies in the shifts of focus for the Hollywood studio system might.
Lasting over two hours in length, the talk threw open countless modes and
angles of thought for approaching dance music culture - neatly reflecting on what
an expansive beast it seems to be in 2012. As you could probably
anticipate on a talk partly interested in modes of tradition in electronic music,
it didn’t take long for attention to shift to the good ole days. Joe Muggs quickly reminisced on dance music’s classless, raceless, MDMAzing golden (or crystal?) age; a
rather romantic image of the early nineties as an era where sonic innovation
was oozing out of all manner of soundsystems and bassbins – and feverishly
beamed across the nation by the pirate stations – is conjured up. To be fair,
although this is a rather obvious reference point it is a vital one, and served
as a useful way of thinking about communication between the old and the new
throughout the discussion. Muggs later made reference to how he sees dubstep’s
‘gnarly wobble’ as being infested with some of that 90s rave/jungle ‘craziness’.
To me this seems to take some of the formal debates into wider contexts about
how energy flows and shifts over
time. The ‘wobble’ has undoubtedly been a definable textural innovation
in electronic music over the last decade, but what Muggs seems to raise here is
that the reaction of the raver – which
can perhaps be boiled down to that overwhelming desire to lose all inhibition
and go fucking mental at the point of the 'drop' – can be contextualized within the wider history of electronic music. Of course Reynold’s linear theory of the UK
hardcore continuum, for which more can be read about here, is a really useful way of thinking about these transferences of
energy, and served as another important critical undercurrent throughout the
evening.
I’m not sure of how much this has been
discussed elsewhere, but I thought Muggs raised a really interesting point
about the lack of comparable ghettoisation in the UK compared to countries such
as France and the USA. He sees this as leading to the multiracial, more
ambiguously class conscious scenes that have emerged from the UK, stressing the
lack of geographical divide between estates and affluent areas when contrasted,
for instance, to the more rigid ghettoes of inner city America. This feels
vital when thinking about grime – which to me has never seemed that interested in focusing on class or
race divid - while still being very much aware of where it’s come from. I was
also much more on the side of Muggs and Blanning who seemed quite quick to
distance themselves from Reynolds suggestions that grime had in some way failed in
its aims and is now in a period of retreat. For a start, to move away from
reflections on the MCs, grime instrumentals still seem as important as ever.
Blanning namechecked Teeza’s track ‘Bounce’ towards the end – I hadn't previously heard it and I’m glad she brought it up because it’s an absolute monster of an
instrumental.
Of course it seemed inevitable that Zomby
was going to get mentioned at some point and I think he ended up cropping up
in discussion more than any other individual artist. I’ve got to confess I
still have a tough time identifying what is quite
so special about Zomby.
As easily my favourite Zomby
cut had been ‘Natalia’s Song', I couldn’t help but have my opinion of him ever
so slightly tarnished by all that hoo-har surrounding the origins of the track.
But to step away from the sonic side of things, Blanning made a
really interesting point about Zomby’s crazed, rampant Twitter activity attracting an audience that would perhaps have previously had little interest in him. Through this, Zomby, a figure
shrouded in mystery, infamy and skunk smoke, perhaps with the three in equal
measure, becomes an unavoidable character
on the scene. With the trailblazing success of Skream & Benga’s
lads-on-tour personas, and the inescapable rise of Skrillex – coupled with the
downright terrifying declaration by Simon Cowell that ‘DJs are the new rockstars’ – it seems personality and individualism in dance music may be as
important now as it has ever been.
Being far, far from an expert on the dance
music universe, I also left with a host of unfamiliar names for me to go away
and check out (I felt very out the loop whenever footwork jungle mixes got
mentioned… so I’ve quickly amended that). It certainly made a change to
Question Time for some panel-based viewing on a Thursday night, and was a refreshingly serious and measured reflection on the state of current electronic music. Still not quite
sure how Adorno fits into all of it, but perhaps I’ll save that for another
time.